We take for granted that Darwin’s theory of evolution explains every apparent design in the biosphere. Even when we encounter new species and fail to initially explain how its elegant features could have possibly come about, we are confident that the eventual explanation will fit neatly within a Darwinian paradigm. The New Atheists—though wrong about many things—were quite right to dismiss the
I would like to read your explanation of universal economics. The way you are hinting at it makes it sound totally incoherent. Somalia has totally free markets and it is a hell scape. I don’t quite see how you are twisting the evolutionary metaphor on its head. Evolution is a descriptive theory. It describes the process by which every kind of life form than can exist. There is no sense in which something can evolve better or worse. Your theory of economics appears to be prescriptive. Why?
I would like to read your explanation of universal economics. The way you are hinting at it makes it sound totally incoherent. Somalia has totally free markets and it is a hell scape. I don’t quite see how you are twisting the evolutionary metaphor on its head. Evolution is a descriptive theory. It describes the process by which every kind of life form than can exist. There is no sense in which something can evolve better or worse. Your theory of economics appears to be prescriptive. Why?
Economics isn't prescriptive, just like general relativity isn't prescriptive. But in both cases, the theories are universal.
As for Somalia or any other poor or struggling society--progress is never guaranteed.